The article has been automatically translated into English by Google Translate from Russian and has not been edited.
Переклад цього матеріалу українською мовою з російської було автоматично здійснено сервісом Google Translate, без подальшого редагування тексту.
Bu məqalə Google Translate servisi vasitəsi ilə avtomatik olaraq rus dilindən azərbaycan dilinə tərcümə olunmuşdur. Bundan sonra mətn redaktə edilməmişdir.

How the votes in the US elections are considered and why the results cannot be falsified

Citizens' trust in electoral procedures is important for any election. After the events in Florida during the 2000 US presidential election, many Americans questioned the accuracy of the vote count and, accordingly, the election results. "European truth".

Photo: Shutterstock

The reason was the punch card voting machines, the Votomatic System, which proved to be unreliable. In the USA, votes are counted not by hand, but using special machines.

When counting, the machine damaged the perforation holes, which significantly complicated the recounting process, if necessary. The machines did not count ballots with minor dents, incomplete punctures, or damaged perforations. And the so-called “butterfly ballots” confused the voter - he did not know exactly where to put a mark for the desired candidate.

All this together and became the cause of suspicion of inconsistency of the results. The situation is well illustrated in the movie Recount, starring Kevin Spacey.

How the United States responded to this challenge

Have there been any changes over the past 20 years that would make it possible to talk about the impossibility of repeating a similar situation? Moreover, in the current presidential election campaign, statements are constantly heard about the possibility of massive violations and falsifications.

The 2000 elections led to a nationwide electoral reform. According to the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) signed in 2002, all old voting machines have been completely replaced with modern digital equipment.

The current DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) provides significantly greater capabilities. Touch screens, direct recording and storage of voter votes on digital media, warning of an error when filling out a ballot and other improvements quickly became widespread in electoral processes.

How voting technologies are used in the USA

All states are divided into administrative divisions for voting - districts. There are three main types of technology used: paper ballots, electronic ballots, or both, depending on the polling station.

On the subject: 5 facts that make this US presidential election unique

Conditionally "paper" voting

Some voters vote as in the good old days - using a paper ballot. There are two basic ways to fill it in:

  • There is a dotted arrow next to the name of each candidate. The choice is made by pointing the appropriate arrow opposite the desired candidate;
  • by filling in the oval next to the name of the candidate for whom the voter wishes to vote.

After the choice is made, the voter inserts the ballot into a scanner machine that recognizes all the marks.

In case of an error, or if the voter voted for more candidates than allowed, the machine issues a sound signal and a text message about it. In this case, the voter can either re-vote, taking a new ballot, or press the confirmation button, after which the system will accept the ballot with errors.

If the voter chooses to re-vote, the machine returns the ballot, having previously put on it a special mark about the error and its brief description.

The procedure is repeated until the system accepts the ballot.

If a voter confirms a ballot paper with an error, the vote may be partially counted or rejected completely, depending on the type of error.

The most common type of equipment, which practically covers the entire first technological group, is the so-called Ballot / Optical Scan System (PB / OSS). Such machines are not equipped with a screen for additional viewing of the completed ballot, so the voter cannot check his marks again.

After the system accepts the ballot, it goes into a special, safe-like container. Information about marks is recorded in the memory of the machine.

The advantages of this type of voting are as follows:

  • the ability to see the entire ballot at the same time (the voter fills it out on paper);
  • the ability to correct mistakes and avoid erroneous voting for more candidates than allowed;
  • paper confirmation of the choice made;
  • activated directly by the voter.

There are also disadvantages:

  • do not warn about the insufficient number of selected candidates (if you need to select several);
  • there is no possibility of a preview on the machine screen before the final confirmation of the selection.

"Electronic" voting

For “electronic” voting, so-called Direct Recording Electronic machines are used. More modern versions of DRE are equipped with a touchscreen.

These machines offer the voter an alternative approach to expressing will. Before the start of voting, such a machine is activated by an employee of the commission using a special card or code. All the voter needs to do is touch the name of the selected candidate on the screen and press the confirmation button.

If, during the voting process, it is necessary to vote for several candidates, such machines will offer to do this immediately after confirming the first choice.

When the voting process is completed, the result is processed and a so-called check is printed on a special printer located nearby - a ballot filled in by a machine.

Such a printer, aka VVPAT (Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail Printers), is used as an auxiliary equipment for:

  • providing additional verification of the correct operation of the machine with each selection made. Having voted, the voter sees a printed copy of his ballot and can confirm the correctness of its filling. If necessary, the result can be canceled and re-voted;
  • printing a paper check (bulletin), which makes it possible to recalculate the results manually, in the event of a machine malfunction or for any other reason.

A significant advantage of using these machines is that they allow you to choose the language of the interface and, consequently, of the bulletin text. This feature greatly simplifies the voting process for non-English speaking US citizens.

An added benefit is the ability to increase the size of the text on the screen.

Such machines are able to warn the voter about the insufficient number of elected candidates and do not provide an opportunity to vote for more candidates than allowed.

A minor drawback is that in most cases the screens of such machines do not allow viewing the entire newsletter at the same time.

On the subject: 300 thousand immigrants will not be able to vote in the elections due to the slowness of USCIS

The most common models of touchscreen machines and their features

The Diebold AccuVote-TS


  • allows you to cancel the selection and re-elect another candidate without completing the voting process;
  • generates a preview screen before final confirmation of the selection.


  • does not print a hard copy of the bulletin (unless supplemented by the VVPAT system);
  • requires activation with a special card before each vote.

Avante Vote-Trakker


  • prints a hard copy of the newsletter (does not require VVPAT);
  • generates a preview screen before final confirmation of the selection;
  • allows you to call the preview screen at any time;
  • does not require activation before each vote.


  • does not allow you to deselect and select another candidate without completing the voting process.

The Hart InterCivic eSlate

The least popular and, accordingly, uncommon is the third type of machines. In appearance, they are quite similar to the previous ones and have approximately the same advantages and disadvantages.

Their characteristic difference is that they work with the help of buttons located in most cases at the bottom of the screen.

The voting process itself is identical to that when using sensor machines - it does not require filling out a paper ballot.

American experts constantly emphasize the practical impossibility of simultaneous massive outside influence on the system in order to manipulate the results of voting and elections and argue that the results of voting in the United States cannot be falsified.

Read also on ForumDaily:

5 US states can legalize marijuana after the elections: how it will happen

He demanded a meeting with the president: a Kyrgyzstani hung out for 13 hours on the Trump Tower in Chicago

In every joke ...: Trump threatens to leave the United States if Biden wins

Why US elections are held on the first Tuesday of November

U.S. election Educational program election 2020 Special Projects
Subscribe to ForumDaily on Google News

Let's face the crisis together and support each other

Thank you for staying with us and trusting! Over the past 5 years, we have received a lot of grateful feedback from readers, whom our materials have helped to arrange life after moving to the United States. We have big plans, we do not want to stop or slow down the pace of work. Even now…

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected our income, and in order to stay afloat, we have to ask YOU for support. We will be grateful for any amount and will make every effort to continue to publish news and a lot of useful information just as quickly.

Thank you for being with us!

Always yours, ForumDaily!

Security of contributions is guaranteed by the use of the highly secure Stripe system.

Do you want more important and interesting news about life in the USA and immigration to America? Subscribe to our page in Facebook. Choose the "Display Priority" option and read us first. Also, don't forget to subscribe to our РєР ° РЅР ° Р »РІ Telegram - there are many interesting things. And join thousands of readers ForumDaily Woman и ForumDaily New York - there you will find a lot of interesting and positive information. 

1135 requests in 2,188 seconds.